Hi everyone 
Thanks again for the very clear and practical feedback â this is exactly the level of detail that helps us improve Astrion in the right direction.
1. TV ROS Card + HA entity support
What youâre describing is very aligned with our current internal focus.
We agree that the TV ROS Card becomes significantly more powerful when it can properly represent and control all relevant HA entity types, not just scripts.
The goal is exactly what you outlined:
We are actively working toward expanding this layer so the TV ROS Card can become a true unified control surface for HA, rather than a limited subset.
Your framing is correct:
once HA entity coverage is complete, the card becomes a solid foundation for all Astrion devices and future remotes.
2. HA integration for the remote itself (device feedback loop)
This is also a very important point.
We agree that the system should not be one-way only. The direction we are exploring includes:
This would allow exactly what you described:
HA/automations can actively drive the remote state, not just respond to it
This is part of a broader move toward a bidirectional control model, rather than a purely UI-driven system.
3. Bluetooth / capability clarity (HA100)
Appreciate you raising this directly.
We will make sure the documentation and product messaging is clearer regarding what Bluetooth is used for today vs what is not supported (e.g. HID-style remote control profiles). This kind of clarity is important to avoid confusion and mismatched expectations.
Weâll review the wording to ensure it accurately reflects current hardware capability and firmware scope.
Overall, really appreciate these structured suggestions â they are very aligned with where we are heading. A lot of what youâve described is already on our roadmap, and feedback like this helps us prioritise the order of implementation.
Keep it coming 